Case 3305777/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Mr G Tuck (Director). — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305777/2021
- Decision date
- 13 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Jakins, brought a claim against North Cambs Development Limited, heard by Employment Judge Laidler at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 28 February 2022. The judgment records the respondent as Mr G Tuck, Director, appearing for the respondent, and the claimant appearing in person.
The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to determine the claimant's holiday pay claim because it had been received outside the requisite time period. No findings on the merits of the holiday pay claim are recorded in the written judgment.
The judgment states that all claims are dismissed. No monetary award is recorded, and the written reasons note that reasons were given orally at the hearing and would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to determine the holiday pay claim because it was presented outside the requisite time period. The judgment then records that all claims are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.