Case 3305782/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Vasile v Maritime Transport Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305782/2024
- Decision date
- 15 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Vasile
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 February 2025, the tribunal gave Mr G Vasile an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 1 November 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant's reply dated 4 February 2025 was held not to provide sufficient reasons to avoid strike out.
Employment Judge Graham found there was no satisfactory explanation for the failure to comply with the order or for the failure to pursue the claim. The tribunal also noted that the claimant did not propose any timeframe for future compliance and had continued not to take steps in the intervening period to advance the case.
The claim was therefore struck out under Rule 38(c) and Rule 38(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- Rule 38(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.