Case 3305797/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Sarah Clarke, Counsel v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305797/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Sarah Clarke, Counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge on 8 and 9 June 2023 before Employment Judge de Silva KC. The claimant, Lisa Brittain, brought claims against G Moore Haulage Limited for unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, failure to provide a statement of particulars, and breach of contract concerning a December 2021 bonus. Those claims were all dismissed by the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of wages from 16 to 24 February 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a statement of particulars pursuant to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in relation to bonus in December 2021. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.