Case 3305827/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Wozniak v Lemin & Co. Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305827/2023
- Decision date
- 23 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Wozniak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 8 November 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal said strike out was being considered because the claimant had not complied with the order dated 5 September 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge L Brown struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(c) and Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 22 to 23 January 2024 will not take place. It does not record any merits findings or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) and Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunals Rules
- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.