Case 3305850/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance and no v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305850/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
No attendance and no
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a one-page employment tribunal judgment heard at Bury St Edmunds on 23 January 2024 before Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone. The claimant, Mr K Baker, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, London Borough of Barnet, was represented by Mr David Grey-Jones of counsel.
The tribunal ordered that the claimant’s claims be struck out in their entirety under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, Schedule 1. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability or remedy. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the substantive type of claim; it states only that the claimant’s claims were struck out in their entirety under Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.