Case 3305875/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Forgan v Bacerius Investments Limited and Delesius Investments Limited together as Trustees of Sutton Place Property Unit Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305875/2022
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at Watford on 17 January 2023 before Employment Judge Edmonds. The written record states that the hearing was not objected to by the parties, that the respondent identity was amended by consent to Bacerius Investments Limited and Delesius Investments Limited together as Trustees of Sutton Place Property Unit Trust, and that reasons were given orally at the hearing so no written reasons were provided in the judgment record unless requested.
The claimant succeeded on all four monetary claims recorded in the judgment. He was awarded £6,750 gross for unlawful deduction from wages, made up of £2,250 gross for each of March, April and May 2022. He was also awarded £311.55 gross for 3 days' payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday, with the respondent permitted to make tax and national insurance deductions where appropriate.
The tribunal further awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,557.69, calculated by reference to three years' service at £519.23 for each year. It also awarded £1,462.50 gross for unpaid notice pay for the period from 1 June 2022 to 20 June 2022, described as 65% of one month's pay because the claimant had served the remainder of his notice period before his employment ended on 31 May 2022.
The total of the awards made in the judgment is £10,081.74 gross. The judgment also records that the award is a statement of what is owed to the claimant and should not be read as requiring or inducing any breach of sanctions, government restrictions or other legal restraint affecting access to the respondent's bank account.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as £2,250 gross for each of March, April and May 2022; respondent entitled to make deductions for tax and national insurance as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £6,750 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded 3 days' payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday, stated as £311.55 gross; respondent entitled to make deductions for tax and national insurance as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Redundancy | Awarded a statutory redundancy payment based on three years' service at £519.23 for each year. | Upheld | — | £1,558 |
| Breach of contract | Claim described as unpaid notice pay; classified as breach of contract because the judgment does not identify a separate statutory basis. Awarded £1,462.50 gross for 1 June 2022 to 20 June 2022, described as 65% of one month's pay; respondent entitled to make deductions for tax and national insurance as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £1,463 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,082
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.