Case 3305878/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Garratt v Helix 22 Limited (In administration) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305878/2024
- Decision date
- 22 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms G Garratt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was employed by the first respondent from 1 December 2022 to 5 March 2024, and that her annual salary from December 2023 was £30,000.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to employer payments from the Secretary of State for Business and Trade under ss.166(1) and 182 Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded sums under s.184 Employment Rights Act 1996 for one week's notice pay, eight weeks' arrears of pay, and holiday pay for 11 months, totalling £6,295.34.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are included in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay of one week's net pay under s.184 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £490 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as arrears of pay of 8 weeks under s.184 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £3,290 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as holiday pay for 11 months under s.184 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,515 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant is entitled to employer payments from the Secretary of State under ss.166(1) and 182 Employment Rights Act 1996, but the listed monetary awards are notice pay, arrears of pay and holiday pay only. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,295
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- ss.166(1) and 182 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.184 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.