Case 3305884/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Annunziata v Milton Keynes City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305884/2021
- Decision date
- 26 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Annunziata
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. It stated that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed.
The written record does not include reasons beyond the outcome. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded and that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. Oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included in the available text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.