Case 3305887/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Popescu v KMI Logistics Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305887/2023
- Decision date
- 11 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Popescu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in case 3305887/2023, between Mr I Popescu and KMI Logistics Ltd, struck out the claim. The reasons record that by a letter dated 27 May 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, about why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 April 2025.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. The extracted judgment contains no further findings on the merits and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying substantive claim type. It records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 22 April 2025 after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing following the letter dated 27 May 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.