Case 3305894/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Kimberly Long v Rory J Holbrook Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305894/2024
- Decision date
- 29 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grubb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Kimberly Long
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford by Employment Judge Grubb sitting alone on 17 and 18 March 2025. The claimant, Miss Kimberly Long, appeared in person and the respondent, Rory J Holbrook Limited, was represented by counsel.
The written judgment records a single dispositive finding: the complaint of unfair constructive dismissal was not well-founded. The tribunal stated that the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
No monetary award is recorded in the written decision, and the extracted judgment text does not set out any separate remedy calculation or additional findings beyond the dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written judgment records that the complaint of unfair constructive dismissal was not well-founded and that the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.94 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.