In person For the v Respondent — 2023

Case reference: 3305903/2022
Decision date: 24 May 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
Venue: Cambridge

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant brought various complaints that the respondent discriminated against her because of disability. Employment Judge Tynan dismissed those complaints at the threshold stage, finding that the claimant had not proved on the balance of probabilities that she was disabled at the relevant time for the purposes of section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010.

Because the claimant failed to establish the protected characteristic, the tribunal did not uphold any disability discrimination complaint. The judgment records that the complaints were dismissed on that basis and does not identify any separate monetary remedy or award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The tribunal dismissed the claimant's disability discrimination complaints because she had not established, on the balance of probabilities, that she was disabled within the meaning of section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.