Case 3305928/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Butt v PMP Recuitment / Cordant Recruitment Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305928/2021
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Butt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment in Mr H Butt's case against PMP Recruitment / Cordant Recruitment Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the claim was struck out because it was not being actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying dispute.
The tribunal noted that it had sent emails on 19 October 2022, 24 November 2022, 11 January 2023, 8 February 2023 and 14 March 2023 giving the claimant an opportunity to contact the tribunal to explain whether he was still pursuing the claim, or whether it should be treated as withdrawn or settled, as had been considered in the similar case 3305954/2021. The claimant did not respond.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant had previously not replied to the respondent's correspondence in January and February 2022, which alleged failure to comply with case management orders. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out because it was not being actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not restate the substantive pleaded claim type; the case was listed on GOV.UK under Working Time Regulations. The tribunal struck the claim out under rule 37 because it was not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.