Case 3305929/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Parkes v Tiffin Sandwiches Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305929/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Parkes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr N Parkes against Tiffin Sandwiches Ltd. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded £1,456.00 on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £507.00. In a separate finding, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded a further £507.00. The three awards together total £2,470.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,456 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay damages were awarded in the sum of £507.00. | Upheld | — | £507 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £507 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,470
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.