Case 3305951/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Smith v TDH Transport Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305951/2022
- Decision date
- 26 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Cambridge on 6 February 2023 before Employment Judge Michell, found that Mr Lee Smith had been unfairly dismissed by TDH Transport Limited (in voluntary liquidation) contrary to s.104(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent did not appear or be represented. No written reasons were provided in the record beyond the judgment itself.
The only remedy recorded was a compensatory award of £340.58, described as the net salary the claimant would have earned but for the dismissal between 6 and 13 March 2022 inclusive. The judgment does not record any basic award, interest, or separate split between heads of loss beyond that compensatory figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed contrary to s.104(1) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £341 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £341
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £341
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.104(1) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.