Case 3305954/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Fuller v Oregon Scientific (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305954/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Fuller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningClaims 3305954/2020 and 3307547/2020 were consolidated. The claimant's email of 27 October 2020 was treated as an application to amend the claim to include unpaid wages for August, September and October 2020, and that amendment was granted. The respondent did not present a response, so judgment was entered under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal found that Mrs H Fuller was owed unpaid wages for April, May, June, July, August, September and October 2020. It awarded £20,139 in compensation, described as seven months' pay at £2,877 per month, and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. The judgment states that the amount is gross and will be satisfied if the respondent makes a net payment to the claimant and accounts to HMRC for any tax or national insurance due.
The claimant's claims relating to health insurance, income protection, pension contributions and life insurance were dismissed. The tribunal held that these items do not qualify as wages and therefore could not be claimed in the employment tribunal while the claimant remained employed by the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for April, May, June, July, August, September and October 2020 were awarded at £20,139 gross, being seven months' pay at £2,877 per month. The judgment provides for payment net of tax and national insurance if needed. | Upheld | — | £20,139 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claims in respect of health insurance, income protection, pension contributions and life insurance were dismissed because they do not qualify as wages and could not be claimed in the employment tribunal while the claimant remained employed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,139
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.