Case 3305957/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Renoy Gladson v Auditcare Kirlena House Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305957/2023
- Decision date
- 24 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Renoy Gladson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Bury St Edmunds via CVP on 19 June 2023 before Employment Judge Graham, the tribunal considered the claimant's application for interim relief under s.128 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was represented by his cousin, Mr M S Pulickal, and the respondent by solicitor Mr R Dempsey.
The tribunal's recorded decision was that the application for interim relief failed and was dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out any further substantive findings or any monetary remedy, and no award was made.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claimant's application for interim relief under s.128 Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed. It does not set out the underlying substantive claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.