Case 3305973/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Kidd v Mr George Morris and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305973/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss A Kidd
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondents, Mr George Morris and Mrs Nicola Morris, failed to present a response to the claim. The tribunal therefore entered judgment for the Claimant, Miss A Kidd, under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The only substantive claim recorded in the judgment was for unauthorised deductions from wages. The tribunal found that the Claimant had suffered unauthorised deductions and awarded her £1,068.83 in compensation, which the Respondents were ordered to pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Respondents did not present a response. Judgment was entered under Rule 21 and the Claimant was awarded £1,068.83 for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,069
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,069
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.