Case 3305976/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305976/2021
- Decision date
- 1 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Watford on 1 June 2022, Employment Judge Bedeau dealt only with case management issues in Mr Piotr Zubik's claims against Greggs plc. The tribunal struck out the redundancy payment claim because it had no reasonable prospect of success, and it also struck out the unpaid holiday pay claim on the same basis.
The tribunal then considered the direct race discrimination claim. It found that this claim had little reasonable prospect of success and ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £400 if he wished to pursue it further. No final merits determination was made on that claim in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal said the redundancy payment claim had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal said the unpaid holiday pay claim had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal said the direct race discrimination claim had little reasonable prospect of success and ordered a deposit in the sum of £400. | Other | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.