Case 3305996/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Jeffery v Priors Court Foundation — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305996/2023
- Decision date
- 30 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Jeffery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss R Jeffery, was originally described in an earlier order as bringing a claim of constructive unfair dismissal only. The reasons record that the agreed list of issues concerned allegations of incidents said to have occurred or been allowed to occur by the respondent, said to amount to a breach of trust and confidence, but that position changed when the respondent sent an email on 28 March 2024 conceding liability for unfair dismissal to bring the proceedings to a close.
The tribunal treated that concession as sufficient to determine the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, on the basis that no part of the unfair dismissal claim was contested in the sense relevant to the rule. The tribunal said it did not need to make findings on the underlying allegations once the fairness of the dismissal was no longer in dispute, and noted that there were no Polkey or contributory fault arguments being run.
The judgment therefore records a finding that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. On remedy, the respondent said the amount sought was £1,419.66 and the claimant did not dispute that sum, although she did not agree with the respondent's attempt to concede liability without accepting the factual allegations said to underpin the dismissal. The tribunal awarded £1,419.66 by way of compensation and stated that the listed final hearing on 20-22 May 2024 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's pleaded case was originally described as constructive unfair dismissal, but the respondent later conceded unfair dismissal and the tribunal entered judgment on that basis under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,420
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,420
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- no part of a claim is contested
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.