Case 3306008/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Mukahadzi v SFB GoodOaks homecare — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306008/2024
- Decision date
- 6 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Mukahadzi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the claimant's unfair dismissal claim only at a procedural stage. By letter dated 14 August 2024, it gave Miss C Mukahadzi an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, because she appeared to lack the two years' continuous employment usually required to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
Miss Mukahadzi did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Dick ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive findings on dismissal, liability, or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the claim after writing on 14 August 2024 to give the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she appeared to lack the two years' continuous employment usually required to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.