I Ceban v Mach Recruitment Limited — 2021

Case reference: 3306009/2020
Decision date: 12 April 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Foxwell

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

I Ceban

Respondent

Mach Recruitment Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 2 March 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The possible grounds identified were non-compliance with Tribunal orders dated 14 November 2020 and 8 January 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Working time regulations	The judgment records that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. It does not set out substantive findings on the Working Time Regulations issue.	Struck out	—	—
Other	The gov.uk listing identifies a Written Pay Statement issue, but the judgment itself does not give substantive particulars. The claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.