Case 3306012/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Karaiskos v KM Renovations Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306012/2024
- Decision date
- 25 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Karaiskos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Karaiskos presented his claim on 19 June 2024. KM Renovations Ltd did not present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Young decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's ULEZ penalty charge and diesel charges.
The tribunal ordered KM Renovations Ltd to pay £1,620 gross in respect of the wages claim, £90 for the ULEZ penalty charge, and £113 for diesel charges, making a total award of £1,823.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprised £1,620 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages, £90 for the claimant's ULEZ penalty charge, and £113 for diesel charges. | Upheld | — | £1,823 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,823
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.