Case 3306013/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brian Gregory v Mr Peter Howett trading as British Meat — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306013/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrison Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brian Gregory
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant. The judgment was given orally at a two-day hearing in Reading on 27 and 28 May 2025 before Employment Judge Harrison, with both parties appearing in person.
In assessing remedy, the tribunal applied a 50% Polkey adjustment, finding there was a 50% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed had a fair procedure been followed. A 10% uplift was applied to the compensatory award under section 207A(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for the respondent's failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. The tribunal also considered it just and equitable to reduce both the basic and compensatory awards by 50% because of the claimant's conduct before the dismissal.
The respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £8,963 and a compensatory award of £1,059. The compensatory loss was calculated from commuting expenses (£1,750), one week of lost paid holiday (£747) and lost employer pension contributions over two years (£1,353), before the Polkey, ACAS and contribution adjustments were applied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £8,963 and compensatory award of £1,059 ordered. Compensatory award reflects a Polkey adjustment of 50%, a 10% uplift under s.207A(2) TULR(C)A 1992 for failure to comply with the ACAS Code, and a further 50% reduction for the claimant's contributory conduct. The basic award also reflects a 50% reduction for contribution. | Upheld | — | £10,022 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,022
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £8,963
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,059
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Polkey adjustment
- s.207A(2) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.