Case 3306035/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dotse v UK Atomic Energy Authority — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306035/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dotse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 31 August 2023 and sent on 7 December 2023, the tribunal gave Mr R Dotse an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the race discrimination and disability discrimination claims should not be struck out because they had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
In consequence, the tribunal struck out the race discrimination claim. The reasons record that the strike-out was on the basis that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
The tribunal did not finally determine the disability discrimination claim in this judgment. Instead, it directed the claimant to provide further information in respect of that claim, which had been requested separately.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal had previously given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the race discrimination claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make sufficient representations, so the race discrimination claim was struck out. The disability discrimination claim was not finally disposed of in this judgment; the tribunal directed the claimant to provide further information separately. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.