Case 3306048/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. N. Ihtash v Holland & Barrett Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306048/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. Matthews Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. N. Ihtash
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N. Ihtash brought claims of unfair dismissal and unauthorised deductions from wages against Holland & Barrett Limited. The case was heard at Watford on 22, 23 and 24 July 2024 before Employment Judge S. Matthews. The written judgment records that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the respondent did not make unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages, so that claim was dismissed as well. The written record states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent did not make unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and that the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.