Case 3306057/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Morgan v Stowe Warehousing Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306057/2023
- Decision date
- 26 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Graham heard the case at Bury St Edmunds via CVP on 9 February 2024. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent did not attend. The tribunal issued a judgment on three matters and indicated that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal found that the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and ordered the Respondent to pay £1,425 in damages. It further found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £513. The tribunal also found that the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,137.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,425 |
| Holiday pay | Gross sum awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £513 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of £2,137.50; rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £2,138 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,076
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.