Case 3306061/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Olegs Lacplesis v First Respondent: Patrick James Long, William Stephen Long & the personal — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306061/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Olegs Lacplesis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the First to Fifth Respondents failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Mr Olegs Lacplesis worked at the Lutton Farm establishment and was dismissed as redundant on 3 May 2024. There was no recognised trade union or elected employee representative at the establishment, and 20 or more employees were placed at risk of redundancy on, or within 90 days of, 11 April 2024. His individual claim for a protective award succeeded. The Tribunal awarded 90 days' remuneration for a protected period beginning on 11 April 2024, with the Recoupment Regulations applying. It found no reason to depart from the principle that protective awards should be for the maximum period unless circumstances made it just not to do so.
The Tribunal also found Mr Lacplesis entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £8,460.04, calculated using gross weekly pay of £512.73, 14 years' continuous service and an age of 46 at dismissal. His unauthorised deduction from wages claim succeeded because he had not been paid from 8 April 2024; the Tribunal awarded £2,238.16 in arrears of pay. It additionally awarded £823.46 for unpaid accrued but untaken holiday pay. The First to Fifth Respondents were ordered to pay these quantified sums jointly and severally within 14 days.
The Tribunal recorded that Mr Lacplesis successfully mitigated his loss following dismissal and made no claim for notice pay. The claim against the Sixth Respondent, the Secretary of State, was not determined in this judgment and was to be listed for a case management hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 189 TULRCA 1992 against the First to Fifth Respondents: 90 days' remuneration from 11 April 2024. The judgment did not quantify the award in money. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment based on gross weekly pay of £512.73, 14 years' continuous service and age 46 at dismissal. | Upheld | — | £8,460 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay for the period from 8 April 2024 to 3 May 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,238 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid accrued but untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £823 |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189(5)(b) TULRCA 1992 time limit
- protective awards should be for the maximum period unless circumstances make it just not to do so
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.