Case 3306065/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Serhii Chubaryk v First Respondent: Patrick James Long, William Stephen Long & the personal — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306065/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Serhii Chubaryk
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld Mr Serhii Chubaryk's individual claim for a protective award against the First to Fifth Respondents. It found that 20 or more employees at the Lutton Farm establishment were placed at risk of redundancy on, or within 90 days of, 11 April 2024, and that there was no recognised trade union or elected employee representatives. The claimant was dismissed as redundant on 3 May 2024 during that period, contrary to the statutory consultation requirements. Finding no reason to depart from the principle that protective awards should be for the maximum period unless it is just to reduce them, the Tribunal awarded 90 days' remuneration for a protected period beginning on 11 April 2024. The Recoupment Regulations apply.
The Tribunal also upheld the unauthorised deduction from wages claim. It found that the claimant had not been paid wages for 1 May to 3 May 2024 and ordered the First to Fifth Respondents, jointly and severally, to pay £271.70 in arrears within 14 days. No quantified monetary value was given for the protective award, so the judgment did not state a combined total award.
Although the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy, the Tribunal found that he had less than two years' service and was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. He had successfully mitigated his post-dismissal loss, and there was no claim for notice pay. The claim against the Sixth Respondent, the Secretary of State, was not determined and was to be listed for a case management hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The individual claim for a protective award under section 189 TULRCA 1992 succeeded against the First to Fifth Respondents. The Tribunal ordered 90 days' remuneration for the protected period beginning on 11 April 2024; no monetary sum was stated, and the Recoupment Regulations apply. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The First to Fifth Respondents were ordered, jointly and severally, to pay £271.70 in arrears for wages unpaid from 1 May to 3 May 2024. | Upheld | — | £272 |
| Redundancy | The claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- sections 188 and 189 TULRCA 1992
- section 189(5)(b) TULRCA 1992
- maximum-period principle for protective awards
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.