Case 3306073/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Hawkins Respondent 1: Beautiful Borders Respondent 2: Mrs K Tegg v Mrs K Tegg — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306073/2023
- Decision date
- 6 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Hawkins Respondent 1: Beautiful Borders Respondent 2: Mrs K Tegg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis hearing determined only whether Mrs K Hawkins was disabled for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010 during the material period, which the tribunal identified as 13 October 2022 to 17 April 2023. Applying the claimant's burden of proof and the authorities it cited on impairment, substantial adverse effect and long-term effect, Employment Judge Graham found that she had a mental impairment at the material time.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant's mental health difficulties had existed for many years, including a 2002 diagnosis of mixed anxiety and depressive disorder and EUPD traits, long-term antidepressant treatment, and evidence of trauma-related symptoms linked to her Navy service. It accepted that, during the material period, the claimant experienced low mood, anxiety, social avoidance, anger, difficulty dealing with confrontational behaviour, and difficulty coping with multiple or unplanned instructions, and that these affected normal day-to-day activities.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was working part-time because full-time work would become too much for her to deal with, and that the medication and weekly support from Dr Le Page and the mental health nurse were measures which kept her condition stable but did not cure it. Applying Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1), it treated the effects as substantial in the absence of those measures, and found that the effects had lasted for at least 12 months. No liability decision was made on the underlying discrimination, wages, or holiday claims at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Reserved judgment on a preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within s.6 Equality Act 2010 during the period 13 October 2022 to 17 April 2023. The substantive disability discrimination, unlawful deduction from wages, and holiday pay claims were not determined in this hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s. 6 Equality Act 2010
- Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
- All Answers Ltd v W
- Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd
- Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway Limited
- Swift v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Constabulary
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.