Case 3306081/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Chaggar v Vascroft Contractors Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306081/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reindorf
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Chaggar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Reindorf sat alone at Watford by CVP on 24 March, 24 May and 25 May 2021. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr G Chaggar, succeeded on his breach of contract claim for reimbursement of expenses. The tribunal ordered Vascroft Contractors Limited to pay £5,531.08.
The remaining claims did not proceed to substantive findings in the claimant's favour. The redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal after the respondent conceded the claim and paid the outstanding sums before the hearing. The unfair dismissal claim was also dismissed on withdrawal, the judgment recording that settlement had been reached between the parties.
The claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and wrongful dismissal were dismissed as not successful. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was for reimbursement of expenses. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,531.08. | Upheld | — | £5,531 |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal after the respondent conceded the claim and paid the outstanding sums before the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal, with settlement having been reached between the parties. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim was not successful. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not successful. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,531
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.