Case 3306111/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Walia v Kwik-Fit (GB) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306111/2023
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Members
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs A Brown, Ms H T Edwards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Walia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 15, 16, 17 and 18 October 2024 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto sitting with lay members Mrs A Brown and Ms H T Edwards. The claimant, Mr D Walia, was represented by counsel and the respondent, Kwik-Fit (GB) Limited, was also represented by counsel.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were not well founded and were dismissed. The judgment record does not set out written reasons, because the reasons were given orally at the hearing and the written notice states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the notice.
No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.