Case 3306119/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jia-Ning Lee v Allegiant Group Worldwide Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306119/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Jia-Ning Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim brought by Ms Jia-Ning Lee against Allegiant Group Worldwide Limited was dismissed at Reading on 30 May 2024. Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto recorded that neither party attended and that no response had been entered for the respondent.
The judgment states that, on the information available, and because the parties had at some point been discussing the basis of a compromise of the proceedings, the tribunal dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. No findings were made on the merits of the underlying claim and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure after neither party attended; the judgment also notes that the parties had at some point been discussing the basis of a compromise of the proceedings. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.