Case 3306120/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ken Read & Son Ltd (in Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306120/2023
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, employed by the Respondent from 25 January 2000 until 16 June 2023 latterly as Shift Manager, was given notice on 2 June 2023 that his employment would end on 16 June 2023, the same day the Respondent company went into administration. The Administrator consented to the proceedings continuing under the Insolvency Act 1986, and the Respondent did not submit a Response and did not attend the hearing. The Tribunal found the Claimant was unfairly dismissed because he was dismissed without warning and without any prior consultation or discussion, although it also found that, had proper consultation taken place, he would have been fairly dismissed on the ground of redundancy on 16 June 2023.
On the unpaid wages claim, the Tribunal found the Claimant was not paid for the last week he worked or for the two weeks between 2 and 16 June 2023, and that his pension contributions for the last month (£60 employee and £80 employer) were not paid to the Pension Service, giving a total of £1,730. For unfair dismissal, the Tribunal held that an appropriate consultation period would have been two weeks and awarded two weeks' pay of £1,060 as compensation.
The Claimant's complaints of breach of contract and for a redundancy payment were dismissed on withdrawal, having been satisfied by the Government Insolvency Service. The total sum awarded to the Claimant was £2,790.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | £1,590 unpaid wages plus £140 unpaid pension contributions (£60 employee deduction + £80 employer contribution). | Upheld | — | £1,730 |
| Unfair dismissal | Two weeks' pay awarded as compensation for failure to consult; tribunal found that with proper consultation the Claimant would have been fairly dismissed by reason of redundancy on 16 June 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,060 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on withdrawal; satisfied by the Government Insolvency Service. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed on withdrawal; satisfied by the Government Insolvency Service. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,790
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,060
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.