Case 3306122/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Susan Willis v Mrs Charly White — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306122/2024
- Decision date
- 16 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Susan Willis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge M Warren, sitting alone at Norwich on 16 December 2025, heard the claims of Mrs Susan Willis against Mrs Charly White, with both parties appearing in person. The Tribunal upheld the Claimant's claim for holiday pay, ordering the Respondent to pay £206.70.
The Tribunal also upheld the Claimant's claim for unpaid wages, ordering the Respondent to pay £1,030.73, made up of £403 in wages for April 2024 and £627.73 in unpaid pension contributions.
For the avoidance of doubt, the Tribunal recorded that the total payable by the Respondent to the Claimant, without deduction and taxable in the hands of the Claimant, is £1,237.43. The judgment was given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded £206.70 (rounded to nearest pound). | Upheld | — | £207 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded £1,030.73 comprising £403 unpaid wages for April 2024 and £627.73 in unpaid pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,031 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,237
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.