Case 3306157/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sauber Domestic Cleaning Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306157/2020
- Decision date
- 5 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on 12 March 2021 before Employment Judge Hanning sitting alone, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaint that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from her wages. The judgment records that the hearing was by video link and that the parties did not object to that form of hearing.
The tribunal upheld the wage deduction claim. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £340, subject to deduction of any tax and national insurance contributions that fell to be deducted. No separate split of the award is given beyond that gross figure.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further factual findings or legal analysis are set out in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a single unauthorised deduction from wages claim. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written request for reasons was made within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £340
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.