Case 3306171/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Figueiredo v Real Money Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306171/2024
- Decision date
- 25 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Figueiredo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 25 June 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Cowen decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal treated the claimant's email of 22 December 2024 as an application to amend the claim and allowed an amendment in the interests of justice to include June, July and August 2024 claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay. The respondent was ordered to pay GBP 12,923.12 gross in unpaid wages and GBP 1,200.03 in holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time; award stated as gross unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £12,923 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal allowed an amendment to include unpaid wages and holiday pay for June, July and August 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,123
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.