Case 3306227/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Costa v Signorellis Deli Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306227/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Costa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was a complaint of Redundancy Payment. The Tribunal issued a letter dated 02/09/2024 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why that complaint should not be struck out.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had not complied with the order dated 02/09/2024. It further found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations why the complaint should not be struck out, and failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, the complaint of Redundancy Payment was struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded or discussed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal struck out the complaint after the claimant did not comply with the order dated 02/09/2024 and did not make written representations, sufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.