Case 3306232/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Mohsenvand v Abbey Ravenscroft Park Nursing Home — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306232/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdoch Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Mohsenvand
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mrs P Mohsenvand’s complaint of unfair dismissal under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and that she was unfairly dismissed. In remedy terms, the tribunal said it was unlikely the respondent would have dismissed her in any event, so no Polkey deduction was made. It also recorded that there would be no uplift under section 207A(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures in relation to the dismissal.
The tribunal found that the claimant had contributed to her dismissal by 50%, and said both the basic and compensatory award would be reduced accordingly. However, the judgment did not determine the quantum at this stage and directed that quantum would be decided at a remedy hearing on 8 July 2025.
The tribunal also found that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded and awarded notice pay for four weeks. As with the unfair dismissal remedy, the judgment did not set a final monetary figure in this decision and left quantum to the later remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded. The tribunal said it was unlikely the respondent would have dismissed the claimant in any event, so no Polkey deduction was made. The tribunal also recorded no uplift under s.207A(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and a 50% reduction for contributory conduct to both the basic and compensatory award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was found well-founded and was awarded for four weeks. The tribunal said the quantum would be decided at a remedy hearing on 8 July 2025. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Part X Employment Rights Act 1996
- Polkey deduction
- s.207A(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.