Case 3306250/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Uduje — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306250/2021
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded. It awarded £2,287 net in respect of notice pay, £2,000 gross in respect of a relocation package, and £1,336.50 gross in respect of a supplement paid in place of pension.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was also well founded and was upheld. The tribunal awarded £2,917 gross for wages in respect of March 2021 and £2,019 gross for wages for the period 1 to 21 April 2021.
The claim relating to unpaid annual leave on termination succeeded under s.14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal awarded £1,072 for eight and a half days' leave, calculated at £134 per day. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £11,631.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Succeeded in respect of notice pay (£2,287 net), a relocation package (£2,000 gross), and a supplement paid in place of pension (£1,336.50 gross). | Upheld | — | £5,624 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld in respect of wages for March 2021 (£2,917 gross) and for 1 to 21 April 2021 (£2,019 gross). | Upheld | — | £4,936 |
| Working time regulations | Succeeded on the failure to make payment on termination for accrued annual leave contrary to s.14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; awarded £1,072 for eight and a half days at £134 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,072 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,632
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.