Case 3306264/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M. Khan v Spice Villege Indian Restaurant Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306264/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M. Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr M. Khan's claims against Spice Villege Indian Restaurant Ltd for failure to pay notice pay, unlawful deductions from wages, and payment in lieu of annual leave. It awarded £190.15 for one week's notice pay due on termination on 1 March 2020.
It also awarded £437.75 for unpaid wages, including overtime, due in December 2019, and £1,647.96 for unpaid wages due in January and February 2020. The claim for payment in lieu of annual leave was found well-founded for the period from 1 September 2019 to 1 March 2020, and £411.99 was awarded. The total sum payable was £2,687.85.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for failure to pay one week's notice pay due on termination on 1 March 2020. | Upheld | — | £190 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unpaid wages in December 2019, including overtime pay. | Upheld | — | £438 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unpaid wages due in January and February 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,648 |
| Holiday pay | Payment in lieu of annual leave found well-founded for the period 1 September 2019 to 1 March 2020. | Upheld | — | £412 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,688
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.