Case 3306345/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L King v Oasis and Warehouse Limited (in administration) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306345/2020
- Decision date
- 22 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs L King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered whether the claim against the second respondent, Deloitte LLP, should be struck out. By letter dated 14 May 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on the question whether the claim should be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim against the second respondent. The judgment does not set out the underlying substantive claim or any determination in relation to the first respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only states that the claim against the second respondent, Deloitte LLP, was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success. It does not identify the underlying cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.