Case 3306350/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M S Mourtafia El Mrini v B&M Retail Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3306350/2022
- Decision date
- 12 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M S Mourtafia El Mrini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 24 February 2023 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not separately set out the pleaded unfair dismissal claim; this classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not separately set out the pleaded race discrimination claim; this classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. It does not separately set out the pleaded breach of contract claim; this classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.