Case 3306350/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Margetts, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 3306350/2024
- Decision date
- 6 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms E Margetts, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Watford on 6 May 2026, Employment Judge French struck out Eagle Rehabilitation Services' response under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not attend the hearing; Ms E Margetts, counsel, appeared for Ms S Cadogan.
The written judgment does not adjudicate the merits or record an outcome for the unfair dismissal or unlawful deduction from wages claims. It makes no monetary award and provides no remedy breakdown. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons available upon a timely request by either party.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the response was struck out; it does not determine the unfair dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the response was struck out; it does not determine the unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.