Case 3306361/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Gooda Mr R Gooda v EHBC Ltd (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306361/2020
- Decision date
- 19 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Gooda Mr R Gooda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in case numbers 3306361/2020 and 3306371/2020. The respondent was EHBC Ltd (in liquidation). Employment Judge Maxwell recorded that the tribunal had written to the claimants on 6 December 2021 giving them an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimants did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claims. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits, any remedy, or any separate findings on liability.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claims after the claimants did not respond in writing or request a hearing following the letter of 6 December 2021. The reason given was that the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.