Case 3306369/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Flannery v British Gas Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306369/2020
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Flannery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing determined whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the claimant's unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims against British Gas Services Limited, given that the claims were presented outside the ordinary time limits. The claimant accepted that the claim form was presented out of time.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's representative conceded twice that the claimant could have submitted the claims in time. The claimant argued that he had believed Centrica Plc was his employer because it appeared on payslips, pension material, and was connected with the respondent, but the representative maintained the concession that it had been reasonably practicable to present the claims in time.
Employment Judge Fredericks placed great weight on that concession and also found that, even without it, it would have been reasonably practicable for the claimant to identify the respondent from his employment contract or seek early assistance before the time limit expired. The claims were therefore dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing because the tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing because the tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Article 7 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- reasonably practicable
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend on Sea Borough Council [1984] IRLR 119 CA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.