Case 3306370/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Khan v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306370/2022
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claim for religion or belief. It recorded that, by a notice and order dated 24 August 2022, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success, because no details of such a claim were given on the claim form.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The religion or belief claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment describes the claim as a claim for religion or belief and dismisses it because no details of any such claim were given on the claim form and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after being given an opportunity to do so. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.