Case 3306379/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Ahmed v Solved solutions — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306379/2021
- Decision date
- 19 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs H Ahmed's claim against Solved Solutions. It recorded that by letters dated 6 November 2021 and 19 December 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal letters dated 21 August 2021.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not be ordered, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out.
No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment text supplied. The extract contains only the strike-out decision and the administrative dates on which the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive underlying claim type. It records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with Tribunal correspondence and failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.