Case 3306395/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G. Leszczynski First v BFS Group Limited Second Respondent: 3663 Transport Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306395/2024
- Decision date
- 25 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. A.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G. Leszczynski First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent heard at Norwich on 22 May 2025 before Employment Judge Mr. A. Spencer. The written record states that all claims against the first respondent, BFS Group Limited, were dismissed. It also dismisses the complaints identified as failure to pay holiday pay, breach of contract, and breach of statutory duty/health and safety.
The breach of contract dismissal was expressly qualified: the judgment said that any wrongful dismissal claim was not dismissed. The record does not set out substantive findings or a monetary award, and the note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons only to be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment dismissed the complaint of failure to pay holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismissed the breach of contract complaint, apart from any wrongful dismissal element. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment stated that this claim was not dismissed; no final disposal or remedy is recorded in the written record. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The judgment dismissed the complaint described as breach of statutory duty/health and safety. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.