Case 3306403/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Obinna Igbo v Whittington Hospital — 2023
- Case reference
- 3306403/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bennett Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Obinna Igbo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Obinna Igbo, was dismissed by Whittington Hospital on 23 February 2022 for gross misconduct. He brought an ET1 on 31 May 2022 alleging unfair dismissal and victimisation, after making contact with ACAS on 24 May 2022 and receiving an ACAS certificate on 26 May 2022. The respondent raised jurisdiction, saying the claims were out of time, and the tribunal dealt first with limitation before any amendment application.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal held that the effective date of termination remained 23 February 2022 notwithstanding the internal appeal process. Applying section 111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the authorities cited in the judgment, it found the limitation date was 22 May 2022. Because ACAS was not contacted until 24 May 2022, the conciliation extension could not assist, and the ET1 was therefore nine days late.
The tribunal then considered whether it was not reasonably practicable to present the unfair dismissal claim in time under section 111(2)(b) ERA 1996. It accepted that the claimant had been under significant distress and had access to trade union support, but found that he had not discharged the burden of showing why the claim could not have been presented earlier. The tribunal noted that he contacted ACAS only two days after the deadline and that no oral evidence was given on the pressures he said affected him.
The tribunal also treated any stand-alone victimisation claim as out of time and found that the claimant had not shown it would be just and equitable to extend time. Because the claims were out of time and beyond jurisdiction, the tribunal said there was no need to deal with the amendment application or other applications.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as out of time. The tribunal found the effective date of termination was 23 February 2022 and that the claim should have been presented by 22 May 2022; the ET1 was submitted on 31 May 2022, nine days late. The tribunal rejected the argument that the ongoing internal appeal postponed the time limit and found it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Any stand-alone victimisation claim in the claim form was also found to be out of time. The tribunal held that the claimant had not shown it would be just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.111(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- J Sainsbury Ltd v Savage
- West Midlands Co-operative Society Ltd v Tipton
- Pearce v Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.