Case 3306414/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Navitas Life Sciences GmbH — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306414/2020
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 26 October 2021 at Watford by CVP before Employment Judge Alliott sitting alone. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal noted emails indicating that Navitas Life Sciences GmbH was in German insolvency proceedings and that the claimant had been told by insolvency administrators on 25 October 2021 that he would have no advantages if he proceeded, but the judge was satisfied the respondent had notice and decided not to participate. The tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence.
The claimant said he worked in April, May and June 2020 and had not been paid. He also said his notice period was one month and that his employment ended on 30 June 2020. The tribunal accepted that evidence and found that the claimant had not been paid for three months' employment and had also not been paid his notice period.
The claimant stated that his gross pay was £3,006 per month. The tribunal calculated the unpaid sum as four months at £3,006, making £12,024, and entered judgment for that gross amount subject to tax, national insurance and other lawful deductions. The judgment does not split the figure between unpaid wages and notice pay, and it records the award as arising from unauthorised deductions of wages and/or breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid for three months' employment and for his notice period, but the award was not split between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the respondent had made unauthorised deductions of wages and/or was in breach of contract; the award was not apportioned between the contractual and wages elements. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,024
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.